Screener
FFGX vs FELG
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.37% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than FFGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFGX covers emerging markets markets; FELG covers north america.
- FFGX follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFGX | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $40M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.79% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -14.79% | -23.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFGX and FELG
Explore further