Screener
FFLG vs IWF
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both FFLG and IWF are equity ETFs. The main difference: FFLG follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- FFLG follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- Over the last three years, FFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $132.3B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.3% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.6% | +14.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.87% | 15.79% |
| Max drawdown | -44.82% | -32.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.