Screener
IWF vs FELG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both IWF and FELG are equity ETFs. IWF charges 0.18% a year and FELG 0.18%. The main difference: IWF follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
- IWF follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
- IWF is much larger than FELG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $132.3B | $5.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.3% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.79% | 15.84% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -23.89% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.