Screener
FFLS vs BCFN
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while BCFN is an equity ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and BCFN 0.80%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while BCFN is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; BCFN uses active selection.
- FFLS covers North America; BCFN covers global markets.
- BCFN costs 0.80% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $47M |
| Since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -20.95% |
Similar to FFLS and BCFN
Explore further