Screener
FFLS vs BCSM
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Baron SMID Cap ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while BCSM is an equity ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and BCSM 0.75%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while BCSM is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; BCSM uses active selection.
- BCSM costs 0.85% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $32M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -17.45% |
Similar to FFLS and BCSM
Explore further