Screener
FFLS vs CGHM
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CGHM is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CGHM 0.34%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CGHM is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CGHM uses index tracking.
- CGHM costs 1.26% less per year.
- CGHM is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 3.13% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -5.90% |
Similar to FFLS and CGHM
Explore further