Screener
FFLS vs CGMU
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CGMU is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CGMU 0.27%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CGMU is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
- CGMU costs 1.33% less per year.
- CGMU is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.34% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -4.10% |
Similar to FFLS and CGMU
Explore further