Screener
FFLS vs MSTI
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while MSTI is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and MSTI 0.36%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while MSTI is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; MSTI uses active selection.
- MSTI costs 1.24% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | MSTI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $49M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 5.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 2.45% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -1.47% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.