Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FFLS vs SDSI

The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF

FFLS

The Future Fund Long/Short ETF

Annual cost

1.60%

Fund size

$43M

SDSI

American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$218M

Key differences

FFLS is an alternative ETF, while SDSI is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and SDSI 0.32%.

  • FFLS is an alternative fund, while SDSI is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • FFLS follows a long short strategy; SDSI uses active selection.
  • SDSI costs 1.28% less per year.
  • SDSI is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

FFLSSDSI
Annual cost (TER)1.60%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$43M$218M
Since20232022
Dividend yield0.12%4.84%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategylong shortactive selection
CAGR 1Y-2.8%+4.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+5.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.87
Volatility 1Y9.22%1.66%
Max drawdown-11.05%-1.29%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FFLS and SDSI