Screener
FFLS vs SCHO
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while SCHO is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and SCHO 0.03%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while SCHO is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
- SCHO costs 1.57% less per year.
- SCHO is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $13.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +3.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 1.39% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -5.69% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.