Screener
FFLS vs SCHQ
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while SCHQ is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and SCHQ 0.03%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while SCHQ is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; SCHQ uses index tracking.
- SCHQ costs 1.57% less per year.
- SCHQ is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $788M |
| Since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 4.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -1.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 8.82% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -46.13% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.