Screener
FFLS vs SECT
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
Both FFLS and SECT are alternative ETFs. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and SECT 0.69%. The main difference: FFLS follows a long short strategy; SECT uses option income.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; SECT uses option income.
- SECT costs 0.91% less per year.
- SECT is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | SECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.0% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.28% | 13.60% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -38.09% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.