Screener
FFND vs AIQ
One Global ETF vs Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Key differences
- AIQ costs 0.32% less per year.
- AIQ is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; AIQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AIQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | AIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $8.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +56.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 22.54% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -44.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and AIQ
Explore further