Screener
FFND vs BKCH
One Global ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.50% less per year.
- BKCH is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; BKCH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $314M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +94.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +57.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 70.50% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and BKCH
Explore further