Screener
FFND vs GKAT
One Global ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.41% less per year.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $158M |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and GKAT
Explore further