Screener
FFND vs KAT
One Global ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.25% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $688M |
| Since | 2021 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and KAT
Explore further