Screener
FFND vs HERO
One Global ETF vs Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
Key differences
- HERO costs 0.50% less per year.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; HERO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | HERO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $71M |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | -10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 19.61% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -54.02% |
Similar to FFND and HERO
Explore further