Screener
FFSM vs SCHA
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; SCHA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $22.1B |
| Since | — | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +41.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 18.08% |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -42.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and SCHA
Explore further