Screener
FFSM vs FNDA
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $10.2B |
| Since | — | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and FNDA
Explore further