Screener
FFSM vs SCHC
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; SCHC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $5.5B |
| Since | — | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 15.45% |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -43.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and SCHC
Explore further