Screener
FFSM vs SCHM
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; SCHM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $14.3B |
| Since | — | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 15.72% |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -42.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and SCHM
Explore further