Screener
FFTY vs BGRO
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.25% less per year.
- FFTY is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFTY is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FFTY follows a index tracking strategy; BGRO uses active selection.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $9M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and BGRO
Explore further