Screener
FFTY vs IETC
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF
Key differences
- IETC costs 0.62% less per year.
- IETC is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFTY follows a index tracking strategy; IETC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IETC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | IETC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $774M |
| Since | 2015 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | 20.48% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -38.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and IETC
Explore further