Screener
FFTY vs IWY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.60% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $16.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.1% | +17.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.09% | 15.60% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -32.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and IWY
Explore further