Screener
FFTY vs RZG
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RZG costs 0.45% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FFTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $121M |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.1% | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.09% | 18.69% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and RZG
Explore further