Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FFTY vs XDQQ

CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Innovator ETFs Trust

FFTY

CapForce IBD 50 ETF

Capital-FORCE ETF

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$88M

XDQQ

Innovator ETFs Trust

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$54M

Key differences

  • FFTY is classified as equity, while XDQQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • FFTY follows a index tracking strategy; XDQQ uses structured outcome.
  • Over the last 3 years, FFTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FFTYXDQQ
Annual cost (TER)0.80%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$54M
Since20152021
Dividend yield1.23%0.00%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingstructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+38.1%+18.7%
CAGR 3Y+21.2%+19.3%
CAGR 5Y-1.1%+9.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.680.89
Volatility 1Y34.00%13.87%
Max drawdown-59.46%-35.63%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to FFTY and XDQQ