Screener
FFTY vs XPND
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
Key differences
- XPND costs 0.15% less per year.
- FFTY follows a index tracking strategy; XPND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XPND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | XPND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $37M |
| Since | 2015 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | 17.70% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -38.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and XPND
Explore further