Screener
FFUT vs MATE
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
- FFUT costs 0.17% less per year.
- FFUT is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFUT follows a managed futures strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFUT | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $37M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | managed futures | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -2.84% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFUT and MATE
Explore further