Screener
MATE vs CTA
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.22% less per year.
- CTA is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.72% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and CTA
Explore further