Screener
FHLC vs IHF
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- FHLC costs 0.30% less per year.
- FHLC is significantly larger than IHF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FHLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FHLC | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $777M |
| Since | 2013 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.22% | 21.54% |
| Max drawdown | -28.76% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FHLC and IHF
Explore further