Screener
FHLC vs IXJ
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- FHLC costs 0.32% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FHLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FHLC | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $3.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.22% | 14.46% |
| Max drawdown | -28.76% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FHLC and IXJ
Explore further