Screener
FICS vs LRGF
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
Both FICS and LRGF are equity ETFs. FICS charges 0.70% a year and LRGF 0.08%. The main difference: FICS follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- FICS follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- FICS covers global markets excluding the US; LRGF covers North America.
- LRGF costs 0.62% less per year.
- LRGF is much larger than FICS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LRGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.7% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.29% | 12.40% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -36.03% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.