Screener
FISR vs BINC
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BINC costs 0.10% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; BINC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $16.9B |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and BINC
Explore further