Screener
FISR vs GTOC
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- GTOC costs 0.24% less per year.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; GTOC uses active selection.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | GTOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $188M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -2.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and GTOC
Explore further