Screener
FISR vs GAL
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.15% less per year.
- FISR is classified as fixed income, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $307M |
| Since | 2019 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and GAL
Explore further