Screener
FISR vs NEAR
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- NEAR costs 0.25% less per year.
- NEAR is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, NEAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $4.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and NEAR
Explore further