Screener
FISR vs MEAR
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.24% less per year.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and MEAR
Explore further