Screener
FISR vs PSTR
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.57% less per year.
- FISR is significantly larger than PSTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FISR is classified as fixed income, while PSTR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; PSTR uses tactical allocation.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | PSTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $57M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 8.43% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -14.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and PSTR
Explore further