Screener
FISR vs SECT
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.19% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FISR is classified as fixed income, while SECT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; SECT uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | SECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -38.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and SECT
Explore further