Screener
FISR vs THRO
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.07% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FISR is classified as fixed income, while THRO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; THRO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, THRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | THRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $8.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 13.11% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -26.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and THRO
Explore further