Screener
FISR vs CORO
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.05% less per year.
- CORO is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FISR is classified as fixed income, while CORO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; CORO uses active selection.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | CORO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 15.34% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and CORO
Explore further