Screener
FIVA vs DFIV
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF vs Dimensional International Value ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.09% less per year.
- DFIV is significantly larger than FIVA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIVA covers global markets; DFIV covers global ex us.
- FIVA follows a index tracking strategy; DFIV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIVA | DFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $533M | $19.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -39.60% | -25.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIVA and DFIV
Explore further