Screener
FIW vs WCMG
First Trust Water ETF vs First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- FIW costs 0.35% less per year.
- FIW is significantly larger than WCMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIW covers north america markets; WCMG covers global.
- FIW follows a index tracking strategy; WCMG uses active selection.
- FIW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIW | WCMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $1.0M |
| Since | 2007 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.70% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.60% | -2.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIW and WCMG
Explore further