Screener
FIXT vs HYBX
TCW Core Plus Bond ETF vs TCW High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- FIXT costs 0.10% less per year.
- FIXT is significantly larger than HYBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIXT covers global markets; HYBX covers north america.
- FIXT follows a active selection strategy; HYBX uses index tracking.
- HYBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIXT | HYBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $33M |
| Since | 2002 | 1993 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 7.49% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.71% |
| Max drawdown | -3.02% | -3.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIXT and HYBX
Explore further