Screener
HYBX vs ACLO
TCW High Yield Bond ETF vs Tcw Aaa Clo Etf
Key differences
- ACLO costs 0.30% less per year.
- ACLO is significantly larger than HYBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYBX follows a index tracking strategy; ACLO uses active selection.
- HYBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYBX | ACLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $497M |
| Since | 1993 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 7.49% | 4.84% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.71% | 0.76% |
| Max drawdown | -3.93% | -1.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYBX and ACLO
Explore further