Screener
FIXT vs MUSE
TCW Core Plus Bond ETF vs TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
Key differences
- FIXT costs 0.16% less per year.
- FIXT is significantly larger than MUSE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIXT follows a active selection strategy; MUSE uses index tracking.
- FIXT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIXT | MUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $39M |
| Since | 2002 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 7.59% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.81% |
| Max drawdown | -3.02% | -3.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIXT and MUSE
Explore further