Screener
FLAX vs FLEU
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
Key differences
- FLEU costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLAX is classified as equity, while FLEU is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FLAX follows a index tracking strategy; FLEU uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | FLEU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $69M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.5% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.62% | 17.13% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -33.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAX and FLEU
Explore further