Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FLAX vs FLCH

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLAX

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$47M

FLCH

Franklin FTSE China ETF

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$282M

Key differences

  • FLCH is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • FLAX covers asia pacific markets; FLCH covers emerging markets.
  • Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

FLAXFLCH
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$47M$282M
Since20182017
Dividend yield2.08%2.47%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+48.5%+5.6%
CAGR 3Y+22.9%+9.1%
CAGR 5Y+7.8%-4.2%
Sharpe 3Y1.040.33
Volatility 1Y18.62%19.12%
Max drawdown-42.51%-62.09%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to FLAX and FLCH