Screener
FLAX vs FLJH
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
Key differences
- FLJH costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLJH is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $143M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 5.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.5% | +47.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +20.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.62% | 18.28% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAX and FLJH
Explore further