Screener
FLEU vs FLAX
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLEU costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLEU is classified as alternative, while FLAX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FLEU follows a option income strategy; FLAX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLEU | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $69M | $47M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | +48.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.13% | 18.62% |
| Max drawdown | -33.94% | -42.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLEU and FLAX
Explore further